01 April 2009

Through the Years (part 2)

Updated with Toddler Chuck:

Here is the rest. I was tempted to do an Early College years since I had changed so much from then until my later college years but I was pretty much still like the high school version. Oh, I can't really do late 30's until I'm 40, so just wait 4 years.









5 comments:

Robert Squier said...

Old Man "Fang" Chuck is still my favorite - but these are great too!

Anonymous said...

If you were clinically depressed, you wouldn't have been able to have or complete any goals. Most likely you'd be a disappearing/reappearing student, and people would think you're wasting your parents' hard-earned money while you actually felt really guilty but still couldn't go out in public. Seek to understand before you judge. But I'm talking to a religious person so what's the point?

Anonymous said...

Jeez Anonymous, you're being a little over-sensitive.

Chuck Dillion was my instructor and he is a nice guy. He has *gasp* a sense of humor and is very popular with his students. I know he drew those "artist types" with the intention to make people laugh, not to insult them. And if you went to my school no doubt you'd notice those types too and roll your eyes. In fact, from your super judgmental attitude I bet you'd be loudly insulting.

So lighten up. You're not a drawing, you're a person.

Hey Mr. Dillon, it was AWESOME to see your stuff on Drawn! And thank you for the graduation photos!

Anonymous said...

A sense of humour that relies on ridiculing others isn't funny at all. And this is actually the first time in my life I've felt the need to be "loudly insulting", I usually don't talk much, preferring to live and let live.

Anonymous said...

I enjoyed the drawings, but come on, many of those comments had fangs. Just innocent light-hearted drawings? Like you really asked a student if they were offended by the fact that you notice that they buy embarrassing discount shoes?

Don't get me wrong, I like to make fun of people as much as anyone, and the stereotypes were pretty much spot-on. But don't draw 16 judgmental student classifications, post them on the internet, and then present yourself as a Bible-toting nice teacher guy with innocent intentions. I'd bet anything if some of your students saw these they'd be genuinely hurt.